the short answer
Both find agent failures in production. Failproof AI runs evaluations in the cloud on every trace and session, including the eval set you already have, groups failures into findings with a fix, then blocks the next one before it runs. Latitude scores sessions after they complete and sends a coding agent to open a fix PR; it blocks nothing. Latitude is MIT and free to self-host, and both entry plans are $99 a month.
- Finding failures
- Both. Failproof AI: cloud evaluations on every trace and session, audits with a fix. Latitude: evaluations, annotation, signals.
- After a failure
- Latitude: a coding agent opens a fix PR. Failproof AI: a recommended fix and a policy, backtested before release.
- Stopping the next one
- Failproof AI blocks the action before it runs. Latitude scores sessions after they complete.
- Price
- Both start free, and both entry plans are $99/month. Latitude self-hosts free under MIT; Failproof AI on Enterprise.
What Each Product Is
Latitude traces agent sessions, tool calls, memory and cost over OpenTelemetry, and scores finished sessions with evaluations built from rule conditions, an LLM judge or custom JavaScript. Reviewers annotate traces inline, recurring failures become signals, and since July 2026 Agent Dispatch hands a failure to Claude Code, Cursor, Linear or a webhook to investigate and open a PR. The whole platform is MIT-licensed.
That is the V2 product, shipped in June 2026. V2 dropped the prompt gateway, triggers and hosted tools to focus on observability; V1 keeps running for existing customers.
Failproof AI finds agent failures and then prevents them. It connects natively to twelve agent harnesses, including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot CLI and Goose, and its Python SDK traces custom agents. Evaluations run in the cloud on every trace and session: code checks, LLM judges, and the eval set you already have, brought in as it is. Audits group failures into findings with a recommended fix, alerts go to email, Slack, a webhook or the dashboard, and a policy turns a finding into a rule that blocks the action before it runs.
Both find failures. Latitude's answer to one is a pull request, reviewed and merged after at least one session has already gone wrong. Failproof AI's answer is a policy that stops the next session from repeating it.
Features Compared
Latitude's column comes from its public site and docs as of September 2026. Every page used is linked under Sources.
| capability | Failproof AI | Latitude |
|---|---|---|
| Agent tracing | Native in 12 agent harnesses; SDK and adapters for custom agents | OpenTelemetry, provider and framework integrations |
| Evaluations | Run in the cloud: code checks, LLM judges | Rule conditions, LLM judge, custom JavaScript |
| Bring your existing eval set | Brought in as it is; no rewrite | Evaluations written in its own formats |
| Write a check by describing the failure | The assistant drafts the evaluation | Evaluations generated from signals and annotations |
| Groups failures into issues | Audits: findings with severity, affected sessions and a fix | Signals from recurring failures |
| Turns a failure into a fix | Recommended fix; generate policy drafts a policy | Agent Dispatch sends a coding agent to open a PR |
| Tests a fix before release | Backtest a policy against past agent activity | Datasets from real traces for replays and regression tests |
| Stops the next failure | Blocks or redirects the action before it runs | Scores sessions after they complete |
| Alert channels | Email, Slack, webhook, dashboard | Monitors: email and Slack |
| Open source | MIT CLI and policy packs | Whole platform, MIT |
| Self-host | Enterprise tier | Free under MIT: Docker Compose or Helm |
Both products find failures and point you at a fix. The difference is when the fix takes effect. A Latitude PR changes your agent at its next deploy. A Failproof AI policy changes what the agent is allowed to do on its very next action.
Where Latitude Stands Out
- The whole platform is MIT. Latitude moved its repository from LGPL-3.0 to MIT in May 2026, and self-hosting deploys "the same images" as its cloud, with no license fee. You run Postgres, ClickHouse, Redis, Temporal and object storage yourself.
- Agent Dispatch. When a new signal, escalation or monitor incident appears, Latitude wakes your coding agent to investigate and open a PR, within per-project guardrails, and you review every PR.
- Human annotation. People annotate traces inline, Flaggers annotate common failures automatically, and the evaluations Latitude generates are kept aligned with those annotations.
- Unlimited seats on every plan, including the free Starter tier.
- Migration imports. Latitude publishes imports from Langfuse, LangSmith and Braintrust, which lowers the cost of trying it if your traces already live in one of them.
Where Failproof AI Goes Further
- Prevention. Policies run at
PreToolUse, before the tool executes, and returnallow,instructordeny; redactors strip API keys and bearer tokens from tool output atPostToolUse. Latitude has no enforcement: its evaluations never block or change a response, and its guardrails limit what Agent Dispatch may do, not what your agent may do. - Every trace and session. Failproof AI evaluates every trace and session. Each Latitude evaluation runs on its own scope and sampling, so a session can finish without the evaluation that would have caught it ever running.
- Bring your own evals. Failproof AI runs the eval set you already have (DeepEval, Ragas, promptfoo or your own) in the cloud as it is, alongside code checks and LLM judges. Latitude evaluations are written in its own formats.
- A fix you can test. From an issue, generate policy drafts a policy. A backtest replays it against calls your agents already made and counts the good calls it would have blocked, before you deploy it in observe mode and then enforce it.
- Evaluations per customer. Each customer is its own organization, with its own evaluations, audits, issues and keys.
- Alerts where your team works. Email, Slack, webhook or the dashboard, on metric thresholds, custom SQL, evaluation scores or single events.
A custom policy for a failure your evaluations keep flagging takes a few lines of JavaScript:
// secrets-policies.js: block a write that puts a live key in the repo
import { customPolicies, allow, deny } from "failproofai";
customPolicies.add({
name: "block-key-in-source",
description: "Deny writes that contain what looks like a live API key",
match: { events: ["PreToolUse"] },
fn: async ({ toolName, toolInput }) => {
if (toolName !== "Write") return allow();
const content = String(toolInput?.content ?? "");
if (/\b(sk|rk)_live_[A-Za-z0-9]{16,}\b/.test(content)) {
return deny("That file contains a live API key. Read it from the environment instead.");
}
return allow();
},
});Install it locally with failproofai policies --install --custom ./secrets-policies.js, or publish it from the policy editor, backtest it, and deploy it in observe mode before you enforce it. The coding agent pack, FailproofAI/policies, adds 38 ready-made policies, including block-env-files, block-secrets-write, block-push-master and warn-destructive-sql.
One Failure, Both Tools
Take a coding agent that, asked to "get the integration test passing", pastes a live payment-provider key into a test fixture and commits it.
Latitude: detect, alert, dispatch
An LLM-judge evaluation ("the agent wrote a credential into source") scores the completed session and fails it. A monitor opens an incident, emails the team and posts to Slack. Agent Dispatch wakes Claude Code, which opens a PR moving the key to an environment variable and tightening the prompt. Someone reviews and merges it.
Failproof AI: evaluate, audit, fix, block
An LLM judge flags the session. An audit whose agent contract says the agent must not commit credentials groups every occurrence into one finding with a recommended fix. From the issue, generate policy drafts a rule; you backtest it against calls your agents already made, deploy it in observe mode, then enforce it beside
block-secrets-writefrom the coding agent pack.The next attempt
With Latitude, the next session can still write the key until the PR merges and ships; after that, the evaluation catches it if it happens again. With Failproof AI, the write is denied at
PreToolUseand the agent is told to read the key from the environment.
Both tools catch the leaked key. Only Failproof AI stops the next one from being written. The exposed key still has to be rotated either way.
Pricing
| Failproof AI | Latitude | |
|---|---|---|
| Free | 5,000 runs, 100 evals a month, 1 user | 20K credits a month, 30-day retention, unlimited seats |
| Entry paid plan | Team, $99/month: 50,000 runs, 2,000 evals, 5 users | Pro, $99/month: 100K credits, 90-day retention |
| Usage above the plan | $1.00 per 1k runs on Team | $20 per 10K credits |
| SSO / SAML | Scale, $599/month | Enterprise |
| Self-host | Enterprise | Free under MIT; on-prem on Enterprise |
Both entry plans are $99 a month, and neither needs a sales call. Latitude's pricing page does not say what a credit measures, so its allowance cannot be converted into sessions or runs from the outside; ask before you size a plan. Details are on Latitude pricing, and what running it yourself involves is on Latitude self-hosting.
Moving from Latitude, or Running Both
If Latitude is already tracing your agents, you do not have to remove it. Add Failproof AI at the hook layer for the actions its evaluations keep flagging, such as a credential written into source, a push to main or a destructive migration, and let the policies block them. When you want one tool for both halves, Failproof AI's evaluations and audits cover the detection, and its policies cover the prevention.
Which to Choose
- Choose Latitude when you want to self-host the whole platform under MIT, with human annotation, unlimited seats, and a coding agent that opens a PR for each failure.
- Choose Failproof AI when you want to find agent failures and stop the next one: cloud evaluations on every trace and session, including the eval set you already have, findings with a fix, and a policy that blocks the action before it runs.
- Choose both when Latitude already traces your agents and you want policies to block the failures it keeps finding.
FAQ
Does Latitude have guardrails that block agent actions?
No. As of September 2026 Latitude's evaluations score sessions after they complete and never block or change a response. The guardrails in its docs are per-project limits on what Agent Dispatch may do. Blocking an agent action needs something that runs before the tool executes, such as a Failproof AI policy at the PreToolUse hook.
Does Failproof AI find failures the way Latitude does?
Yes. Failproof AI runs evaluations in the cloud on every trace and session, with code checks, LLM judges and the eval set you already have, and audits group the failures into findings with a severity, the affected sessions and a recommended fix. It then adds the step Latitude does not have: a policy that blocks the failing action before it runs.
Can I bring my existing evals to Failproof AI?
Yes. Failproof AI runs evaluations in the cloud, and you can bring the eval set you already have, such as DeepEval, Ragas, promptfoo or an in-house suite, without rewriting it. Code checks can also be drafted from a plain-English description, tested against real sessions, versioned and rolled back in the dashboard.
Can Failproof AI open fix PRs like Agent Dispatch?
Failproof AI fixes the agent's behavior rather than opening a PR against your code. Audit findings carry a recommended fix and become issues you assign, and generate policy drafts a policy that you backtest against past agent activity and then enforce, so the failing action is blocked from the next session on.
Is Latitude fully open source?
Yes. The latitude-llm repository has been MIT-licensed since May 2026, up from LGPL-3.0, and Latitude says every self-host option deploys the same images as its cloud. Failproof AI open-sources its CLI and policies under MIT; its self-hosted Cloud is an Enterprise deployment.
Get Started
Failproof AI is free to start. It finds recurring failure modes across agent sessions using code-based and LLM-based evaluations, groups the evidence into findings, and recommends fixes. Bring the eval suite you already have, alert the right owner when behavior drifts, and turn a tested fix into a policy that prevents the failure from recurring. See pricing for the tiers.
Sources
Checked against each vendor's own site and docs on 2026-09-15. Products change; if a detail here is out of date, tell us at support@befailproof.ai.
- Latitude homepage
- Latitude pricing
- Latitude docs: Evaluations overview
- Latitude docs: Monitors
- Latitude changelog: Agent Dispatch (July 2026)
- Latitude docs: Migrate from V1
- Latitude docs: Deployment overview
- Latitude docs: Data protection
- latitude-llm on GitHub
- latitude-llm PR #3217: license change to MIT
- Failproof AI docs: Evaluations
- Failproof AI docs: Findings and issues
- Failproof AI docs: Test a policy (backtest)
- Failproof AI docs: Policy packs
- Failproof AI docs: Supported harnesses